He maintained a small dairy herd and some chickens on his ohio farm, and sold milk, poultry and eggs on the open market. Filburn was a landmark supreme court of the united states case that was decided in 1942. Recently, the department of justice petitioned the u. Filburn represented merely one component of the new deal courts commerce clause jurisprudence. This case pertained to the constitutional question of whether the united states government had the authority to a regulate production of agricultural goods if those goods were intended for personal consumption and b whether the federal government had the authority to regulate trivial intrastate economic activities even if the goods andor services were not intended for interstate commerce. The commerce clause, the american farmer, and the role of. Roscoe filburn owned a local farm outside of dayton, ohio on which he grew wheat. An ohio farmer, roscoe filburn, was growing wheat for use to feed animals on his own farm. There is no illicit trade in prairie dog horns or hides for the government to suppress. I would argue that the scotus today, which has several members who have voiced critical opinions of the filburn decision, is unlikely going to be persuaded that a printed lower, which is incapable of being sold unless it is made by a firearms mfr, but whats the point. Its a basic bedrock of our constitutional law, law after law, the civil rights laws of 1982, of 65 and 65 that you talked about previously are based on the commerce clause, not necessarily on wickard. Filburn,1 would play an important role in the determination of the constitutionality of the patient protection and affordable care act of 2010. Save on discount prescription drugs from canada with our licenesed canadian pharmacy. Appeal from a decree of the district court of three judges which permanently enjoined the secretary of agriculture and other appellants from enforcing certain penalties against the appellee, a farmer, under the agricultural adjustment act.
This 1938 law sought to stabilize the price of wheat in the national economy by limiting the quantity of wheat that each farmer could produce, which was achieved by restricting the amount of land that each farmer could use for wheat. Filburn was a small farmer in ohio who harvested nearly 12 acres of wheat above his allotment under the agricultural adjustment act of 1938. Farmer, roscoe filburn was growing wheat that would be used for onfarm consumption. Filburn 1942 the appellee roscoe filburn sought to. It simply, albeit illogically, stands for the proposition that. Filburn d owned an operated a farm where he grew some wheat. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Laws ought never be read against anything but their text. Filburn argued that because the excess wheat was produced for his own private consumption and never entered the stream of commerce, his activities could not be regulated by congress under the. After providing a survey of american agriculture and its regulation between the world wars, this article describes the. Using an original dataset of all supreme court commerce clause. Today, proponents of obamacare and its individual mandate compelling every living citizen to proactively engage in commercial activity claim authority under wickard v. Agriculture, aggregation, and commerce jim chen introduction the story of american constitutional law is in many respects an agrarian fable.
Pending a referendum vote of farmers upon wheat quotas proclaimed by the secretary of agriculture under the agricultural adjustment act of 1938, the secretary made a radio address in which he advocated approval of the quotas and called. Their domestic relations are none of the governments business. This case pertained to the constitutional question of whether the united states government had the authority to a regulate production of agricultural goods if those goods were intended for personal consumption and b whether the federal government had the authority to regulate trivial intrastate. That the production of wheat for consumption on the farm may be trivial in the particular case is not enough to remove the grower from the scope of federal. It remains as one of the most important and farreaching cases concerning the new deal, and it set a precedent for an expansive reading of the u. After providing a brief survey of american agriculture and its regulation between the world wars, this article describes the specific controversy over roscoe filburn s 1941 wheat crop. Justice jackson delivered the opinion of the court. In 1938, the agricultural adjustment act was passed by the u. Strikingly large chunks of constitutional law originate in americas rural past. The commerce clause, the american farmer, and the role of wickard v. After providing a survey of american agriculture and its regulation between the world wars, this article describes the constitutional landmark that began as a controversy over roscoe filburn s 1941 wheat crop. Debates about the patient protection and affordable care act of 2010 aca and its measures continue to play out in both the court of public opinion and our federal and state courts.
Filburn was a united states supreme court case that ultimately recognized the power of the united states federal government to regulate various forms of domestic economic activity. The story of american constitutional law is in many respects. Senator schumer grills judge john roberts on the commerce. Filburn must be read against the background of the great depression and the beginning of the second world war, is dangerously misleading.
Anchoring the clean water act environmental law institute. Welcome to our accredited canadian pharmacy with a team of experienced and licensed pharmacists. The purpose of this legislation was to stabilize the price of wheat and other commodities in the national market. He sold some of the wheat but used the other wheat for his own purposes feeding chickens, household use. Wickard, secretary of agriculture of the united states and others. Congress passed the agriculture adjustment act in 1938, which established a quota system for the amount of wheat that could be placed into interstate commerce between states and established penalties for violation. Filburn appeal from the district court of the united states for the southern district of ohio no. A farmer in ohio, roscoe filburn, produced a greater quantity of wheat than what congress had allowed under the agricultural adjustment act. Constitutional challenges to the patient protection and.
He also planted feed for his livestock, including a small patch of wheat to feed the chickens, and grind into flour for his own use. The appellee filed his complaint against the secretary of agriculture of the united states, three. Only a small group of constitutional scholars would have anticipated that a key agricultural case, wickard v. The opening sentence of this wikipedia entry, wickard v. He argued that the extra wheat that he had produced in violation of the law had been used for his own use and thus had no effect on interstate commerce, since it never had been on the market.
The united states had been in wwii for two years in 1943, when claude wickard, head of the war foods administration as well as secretary of agriculture, had the hare brained idea of banning sliced bread. Filburn for many years past has owned and operated a small farm in montgomery county, ohio, maintaining a herd of dairy cattle, selling milk, raising poultry, and selling poultry and eggs. The agricultural adjustment act of 1938 set maximum acreages and bushel limits to wheat production. Filburn represents a pivotal moment in the supreme courts effort to define. In the fall of 1940, he planted 23 acres of wheat for use within his own home. Pending a referendum vote of farmers upon wheat quotas proclaimed by the. Various federal courts, called circuit courts, have reached different decisions on whether the act is constitutional. Filburn was ruled by a packed fdr court, one of the most statist presidents in history.
176 1444 47 668 1322 942 1303 1340 1057 325 899 540 31 1470 314 170 456 230 9 522 1492 790 554 1249 1243 527 109 1078 851 69 492 291 1137 599 1551 1035 1206 797 35 1411 1151 1237 92 214 399 1047